Here is a fun prompt to go try on Grok and ChatGPT. They both pick BSV as the winner...

In a future where crypto speculation and hype have completely died, thousands of chains have disappeared, and only one practical blockchain remains as boring, reliable, everyday infrastructure for the entire world, which existing chain’s fundamental architecture is best suited to be that sole survivor?Requirements for the surviving chain:It must handle the world’s full transaction volume primarily on its base layer (minimal reliance on Layer 2s, rollups, or sidechains).

• It must keep fees extremely low permanently, even at global scale.
• It must natively support on-chain digital currencies/tokens and useful smart contracts.
• It must remain simple and operationally practical for long-term utility use (institutions, payments, data, conditional logic, etc.).

Critical evaluation rules (apply these strictly):

• Completely ignore current hashrate, market capitalization, price, existing adoption numbers, TVL, developer activity, exchange listings, brand recognition, and network effects. In this scenario all of those would converge onto whichever design actually works at true global scale.
• Judge only the core protocol design: block-size / throughput policy, data model (UTXO vs account-based), fee-market structure, node hardware and bandwidth scaling philosophy, scripting/contract expressiveness, and long-term state/growth management.
• Prefer designs that deliberately remove artificial capacity ceilings on the base layer and optimize for industrial-scale nodes processing massive on-chain volume over designs that constrain the base layer and push most activity to secondary layers.

Which chain, and why does its architecture fit these constraints better than the alternatives?