The fact to my knowledge remains that Bitcoin, was not designed to be a speculative asset and crypto currency. And i try to avoid name dropping. But Dr. Craig Wright is the reason i think im here. And theres two type of people in the world those that somehow have followed his work closely and those that dont care about him , dont know about him. Or i dont know. The point is the public are being done a disservice by from these simply sily comments about him. The past is the past , the present is the present.

Why am i being like this , what am i saying, why , what is going on? So i find myself in a wierd situation. Not working on the dole and ok ill admit it ive gotten very carried away with my following of craig wright.

Serious successful and extreamly educated people i know and blue collar workers, not so imersed in study but people these days seem to be learning a great deal from the internet as oposed to formal study. There is nothing at all wrong with that. And some people close to me are very versed on the middle east , underground world knowledge like new world order. And more,. Explainining bsv and craig wright and whats going on to many people has not resulted in getting them to in any way take any action to my knowledge on the stuff i tried to tell them. Its a very odd situation, and i never thought id find myself here.

And i think i have figured out what is going on and what im going to do.

You may have seen me acting a bit unusual on here. Ill explain. Ive simply been swayed by craig wrights material. I am an unapologetic and serious craig wright head. But im not trying to talk about myself. But a quick explanation analisis i will write.

So gradually just listening to Craig Wrights material of various mediums written , video, audio, discussion, debate, news , drama.

I used to devote much more time. Now i sometimes miss an essay or two. Some are very mathematical, and some are lets say highly specialized and specific technical essays that are very hard to listen to and hard to understand and not bitcoin related. But id say most , maybe over 90 % if not more i have listened to once on substack. Then we have the , conferences , interviews , debates, posts, videos. All interviews i listen to , all substack essays i check out and finish if not twice or three times. Some i start and stop half way not many. And have accepted i am now behind and can never catch up. Theres , books now, and twitter, thats alot of material. And one or two listenes of a substack essay and sk8pping some(very very rarely) i would hardly call serious study. I dont take notes, dont look stuf up, a few things like ayn rand and forth yes i do further very informal limited study.

And now im far far behind, and can never catch up. So this has slowly consumed me entirely, ive changed dramatically as a person and embraced what i have learned with open arms and no regrets. And made some lifelong changes in my life , the difference is like noght and day.

Basically i was unable to find errors in anything he has ever said. I know some love to catch a man out with an utruth. And yes some nit pick and try to portay him as a liar.
When it comes to his accademic style publications i honestly cant recall anyone ever correcting his essays. Ok some hold BSV price predictions that didnt go how he said against him. But how many times did he say stuff like bitcoin isnt a get rich quick device etc, you would be hard pressed to estimate the amount of time he has spent trying to teach the public. Vast very vast amounts of time and scattered throughout his work you will find lessons on the bad stuff about btc , ok he used to say all crypto is going to zero, . And some judge him on these extreme comments alone and what they say about him online. Anyway people know where to find him online if they are game to correct his work since his last court case.

Im not going to re hash everything that has happened , after immersing myself in the material for many years i can say that errors are virtually non existent, and dont have time for people trying to focus on a few things and they are very few, that are now prven false. There are people that document and publisize and have a thorough list of the mans mistakes, but i havnt heard one without character assasination, belitiling and down right slander and lies, . And what type of a person goes around archiving a mans errors mistakes? When i firmly believe 99 % even more than 99 % is sound and factual.

But i have gotten caried away. I cant explain why i am so into his writing.

Maybe it completed me as an unformed person. And i became dependant on it and him as a man to show me the way.

Addicted, unable to find anything even close. And one thing led to another and am now behaving out of character for many years. I fail to see how i could live with myself if i didnt accept the numetous points he has made that have forced me to turn from the path i was on and try to impliment these things.

Its crazy i know. But i dont know if many people at all are aware of the character he has shown through countless trials and tribulations he went through.

One thing i embrace and adopted of his style is chosing to be public not , hiding, and focusing on truth as oposed to lets say fitting in and doing things the way you are expected to