All I know is that one of the pillars of Bitcoin as conceived by Satoshi is that it is beyond seizure. Furthermore, the white paper makes no mention of NAR (Network Access Rules) or DAR (Digital Asset Rules); quite the contrary. So, can BSV truly still be considered Bitcoin? Technically, NAR and DAR negate that possibility. Bitcoin was not designed to be frozen or redirected through state-imposed governance mechanisms or the decisions of third parties. Any organization or individual trying to convince you otherwise is simply lying. Honesty is essential. Consider another point: compare the writings, temperament, and statements of CSW (Craig S. Wright) over time with those of Satoshi. You will come to realize that BSV is a "super-Bitcoin" developed in collaboration with individuals who have a military background—or are currently affiliated with the military—many of whom specialize in IT. It required time for reverse engineering, adaptation, and complex maneuvering (perhaps involving state actors?). Everyone is, of course, free to hold their own opinions; however, if you examine the actual facts—and the staggering number of established lies—the truth should become crystal clear, provided you are being honest with yourself. I am a long-time veteran of the Bitcoin space; I have witnessed the evolution of factual claims and narratives, and my conclusion is definitive. Remember that the introduction of NAR and DAR shatters the principles of immutability and censorship resistance. If a government or a court can compel miners to reassign tokens, the network loses its decentralized and "unseizable" nature, effectively becoming a traditional legal system grafted onto a blockchain. Also, keep in mind that in his emails and forum posts between 2008 and 2011, Satoshi Nakamoto was always polite, measured, and consistently calm; he avoided personal attacks and focused almost exclusively on the code and the economics of the protocol. CSW, by contrast, is known for his aggressive statements, frequent legal threats, and an often provocative or confrontational tone the complete opposite of the reserve historically shown by Satoshi.