peck.press

№ 963,784

OH BOY !

BE · 2026-08-08 · 2 min read · treechat · tx 942ba4…df7e · block 961,447

OH BOY !

The “BTC nodes war” this Saturday is the BIP‑110 activation crisis, and the latest news shows Bitcoin is hours away from a possible chain split because miner support is near 2–3%, far below the required 55%. Multiple outlets confirm that BIP‑110 cannot activate, and developers are openly preparing proof‑of‑work (PoW) fork code as a fallback. 1. Bitcoin is nearing a chain split this weekend Bitcoin is approaching block 961,632, the height where BIP‑110 nodes will begin rejecting non‑signaling blocks, even though miners overwhelmingly refuse to signal. Miner support is only 2.45% (41 of 1,674 blocks) Mandatory signaling window begins Aug 8–9, 2026 (Saturday) BIP‑110 nodes will enforce rules against 97% of the network’s hashpower. This creates the conditions for a minority chain to split off. ⚔️ 2. BIP‑110 supporters preparing “nuclear option”: PoW change Developers Chris Guida and Luke Dashjr have revived old code to change Bitcoin’s mining algorithm if miners refuse the soft fork. Guida rebased 2017 PoW‑fork code as a contingency plan. Dashjr says a PoW change is the only option if BIP‑110 fails. A PoW change would strand billions of dollars of ASIC hardware and create a fully incompatible chain. 🧱 3. BIP‑110 mathematically cannot activate As of block 961,176, miner signaling is 2.56%, making the 55% threshold impossible this difficulty period. “The math is closed. BIP‑110 does not activate this round.” This means the mandatory enforcement phase will begin without miner support, triggering the conflict. 🪓 4. Ordinals/Runes miners escalating tensions Ordinals‑friendly miners are deliberately filling blocks with large inscriptions: MARA Pool mined a block with only two transactions, one embedding a large Pepe image (3.85 MB). This is seen as a direct challenge to BIP‑110’s attempt to restrict non‑financial data. 🏛️ 5. Major Bitcoin figures warning of economic damage Michael Saylor told BIP‑110 supporters to “stand down.” Adam Back says BIP‑110 has “almost no economic support” and miners won’t sustain a minority chain. Consensus failure is now the central fear. 💰 6. Risk to holders: replay attacks on fork coins If a minority chain appears this weekend, selling coins on the fork could expose users to replay attacks, causing loss of real BTC. CoinDesk warns that signed fork‑coin sales could be replayed on Bitcoin itself. This is the same danger seen in past contentious forks. 🧭 Bottom line for Saturday BIP‑110 will not activate. BIP‑110 nodes will enforce anyway, rejecting most blocks. A minority chain may form, but likely weak. PoW‑fork code exists and could be deployed later. Replay‑attack risk is real if a split occurs. BTC price ($65K) is stable, but markets are watching the fork trade. This is the most serious governance crisis since 2017.