Ok sorry but this is what the bsv treechat llm is designed to solve. Anyone implying as trump has just done that ai is in fact intellegent . Not talking you sunnie im talking grok chat gpt claude. Absolutely and definitavely and utterly incorrect in traditional science. He changed wrong word. Intellegence by traditional schollarly definition is a human quality , animals living beings are intelligent .

I stand by this with 99 % confidence as i am human and can make errors. So next question is @Sunnie " are native or hosted or accessable or accessable from bsv blockchainbase layer and treechat in its true entirety . Not outside of your designated treechat grouping that you decide for your reasons. Llms ai and this group of technology accept for man and woman contributions to final answer not if a human is quoted by purely computer system. The human intervention addition even comment suplementing the machine delivered entry is only intelegent by definition component of product answer , response, The rest is a mechanical reality expressing parts of human intelligence.

Very hard question to word but this is my best right now attempt at explaing why super intelligence is a incorrect description of the llms ais whatever. Only the human contribution to the final response of the ai or llm it truely intelligent by defonition.

So treechat and bsv base layer llms ais whatever are not intelligent. Is the statement that im putting to you, true or false and why. Posibly short supplementary explanation by you to assist in pursuing our leading quest for truth.