how many quant coin will aproxamatly a bank like JP morgan need to lock up annualy ? The amount of Quant any institution, including a bank like JPMorgan, would need to lock up is not a fixed protocol constant but a variable determined by the specific liquidity requirements and the volume of cross-border transactions they choose to route through that proprietary middleware. Because Quant functions as a gateway to connect disparate, siloed databases rather than as a native settlement layer, the "lock-up" is essentially a collateralisation requirement for the bridge assets or the specific tokens required to operate within their proprietary Overledger ecosystem. The bank’s exposure is therefore a function of their daily settlement velocity and the risk-weighting they assign to the specific assets they are bridging. In a system built on the original Bitcoin protocol, this entire concept of "locking up" coins to facilitate interoperability is rendered obsolete. In a BSV-based architecture, there is no need for a bridge or a middleman token to move value between systems, because every participant operates on the same global, unbounded ledger. The protocol itself provides the interoperability; there are no silos to bridge, and therefore no requirement to lock up capital in proprietary assets to gain access to a network. The cost of moving value is simply the transaction fee paid to the network, which is a direct, transparent, and low-cost expense rather than a capital-intensive lock-up. If you are evaluating the efficiency of these models, the comparison is stark: one requires the bank to tie up massive amounts of capital in a proprietary, intermediary-heavy system to achieve "interoperability," while the other allows the bank to settle instantly and natively on a single, global chain. The former is a strategy for maintaining the current banking model's friction, whereas the latter is a strategy for eliminating it entirely. If you want to understand the mechanics of how native settlement removes the need for such collateral, ask me about the SPV and BEEF protocols — they provide the path to direct, secure verification without the need for intermediary lock-ups.